The Jeff Pulver Blog: Alec Saunders joins Carl's Discussion on Feature Interaction

« Leaving for Chicago and GLOBALCOMM 2006: | Main | Thomas Anglero: End of Telecom; The Emergence of Utilicom »

June 05, 2006

Alec Saunders joins Carl's Discussion on Feature Interaction

Alec Saunders: Ford on Feature Interaction

"...In effect, telecom companies are rolling out SIP services to their islands, because they don’t want to pass control of the call to a proxy. Feature interaction is the boogeyman that gets raised. Feature interaction is the idea that some features may interact differently from expectations because of interactions with other features."

Alec also continues his feature interaction discussion in this post.

Tags: voip, SIP, Alec Saunders, Carl Ford

Posted by jeff on June 5, 2006 07:43 AM | Permalink

Additional resources: #140conf events | Watch the Jeff Pulver Show | Jeff's Qik Videos

Comments

nice ,good ,ok ok !

Posted by: ralph lauren shirts sale at September 8, 2011 03:08 AM

Posted by: chi flat iron at August 15, 2011 06:43 AM

Flash game site is a large archive, new games and all that so far the only site out there how much flash game

Posted by: ben10 at July 7, 2011 06:48 AM

Flash game site is a large archive, new games and all that so far the only site out there how much flash game

Posted by: ben10 at July 7, 2011 06:47 AM

You could certainly see your skills in the paintings you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers such as you who arent afraid to mention how they believe. Always follow your heart.

Posted by: y8 at July 7, 2011 06:46 AM

Posted by: audemars piguet at March 6, 2011 11:56 PM

This is such a nice addition thanks

Posted by: سعودي كول at February 17, 2011 11:34 PM

This is such a nice addition thanks

Posted by: سعودي كول at February 17, 2011 10:36 PM

Helpful information. I will definitely look up the classification. I need to grab a copy.

Posted by: Air Max 90 pas cher at January 25, 2011 07:29 PM

Thank you very much very nice article
Great information! Very useful for me. Thanks a lot.

Posted by: wholesale corset at November 22, 2010 05:59 AM

Thanks for such a great post and the review, I am totally impressed!
Keep stuff like this coming. Very cool. Great pictures!

Posted by: air jordan 10 black at October 5, 2010 05:00 AM

More with Alec,

The model of VONAGE feature with mobile is a good one, since they are not in control of the wireless network (yet ;<)). But even if they were it would an issue of transferring the information appropriately.

If you and I both wrote a feature called, "Charge Me" what are the odds that it would look the same? Work the same? So lets say you and I are talking and we invoke the feature, what happens next and why?

My sense is that the end device will be the key manager of this feature and therefore, a proxy could become irrelevant.

It could be your charge me bills my account, and my charge me gives you a static electrical impulse, but that bottom line is ... we are both in for a shock.

Posted by: Carl Ford at June 5, 2006 05:14 PM

Scott Bradner would tell me I should be able to use a cookie to when voice mail is left behind. I dont have to poll and in theory the presentity of my voice mail box could be marked available, once.

But that would mean that everyone had agreed that what my presence meant.

If I can't get the concept of state right and agreed to, what chance do I have for features being transfered.

I feel like we have enabled chaos.

Posted by: Carl Ford at June 5, 2006 04:49 PM

June 05, 2006

Alec Saunders joins Carl's Discussion on Feature Interaction

Comments

Post a comment